【題目】Babies who watch TV are more likely to show late learning development and language at 14 months, especially if they are watching programs aimed at adults and older children, according to a new study, which would probably surprise those parents who leave their babies in front of a TV set.
Babies who watched 60 minutes of TV daily had developmental scores a third lower at 14 months than babies who were watching less TV. Although their developmental scores were still in the normal range, the difference may have been due to the fact that when children and parents are watching TV, they are missing the talking, playing and other communications that are important to learning and development.
This new study, which appeared in the Aechives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, followed 259 lower-income families in New York, most of whom spoke Spanish as their primary language at home. Other studies of higher-income families have also come to the same conclusion: TV watching is not only non-educational, but it seems to slow down babies’ development.
But what about “good” TV, like Sesame Street? The researchers didn’t find any difference when compared to non-educational programs designed for small children, like Spongebob SquarePants. Earlier research by some of the same scientists, most of whom are at New York University School of Medicine’s Bellevue Hospital Centre, has found that parents whose children watch non-educational TV programs like Spongebob SquarePants spend less time reading to their children or teaching them.
At this point, parents reading this will probably be astonished. TV is so often a parent’s good friend, keeping children happily occupied(占時間)so that the adults can cook dinner, answer the phone, or take a shower. But, clearly, this electronic babysitter(保姆)is not an educational aid. It is best to make sure the babies are fast asleep if you have to watch TV.
【1】According to the first paragraph, 14-month-old babies who watch TV probably_______.
A. learn things quickly
B. prefer programs for older children
C. surprise their parents with their development
D. speak later than babies who don’t
【2】Babies who watched 60 minutes of TV daily had lower developmental scores perhaps because _______.
A. they watch non-educational programs
B. they have little communication with their parents
C. they lost interest in real things
D. their parents don’t speak English at home
【3】We can infer from the passage that______.
A. Educational and non-educational TV have different effects on babies
B. Many parents leave babies to the TV to do their own things
C. Educational TV is very popular among higher-income families
D. Lower-income families tend to teach their babies at home
【4】Which would be the best title for the passage?
A. Developing Better Learning Ability
B. A New Study on Babies’ Bad Habits
C. TV Watching Is Bad for Babies’ Brains
D. Make Sure Your Babies Watch “Good” TV Programs
【答案】
【1】D
【2】B
【3】B
【4】C
【解析】
試題分析:本文主要通過對比介紹了看電視與不看電視孩子在學習語言能力發(fā)展方面的不同,告誡人們多與孩子溝通,多交流,讓孩子少看電視。
【1】D。細節(jié)題。由第一段第一句Babies who watch TV are more likely to show late learning development and language at 14 months.可知在14個月大看電視的嬰兒在語言學習開發(fā)方面表現(xiàn)晚。故選D
【2】B。細節(jié)題。由第二段最后一句they are missing the talking, playing and other communications that are important to learning and development.可知選B
【3】B。推理判斷題。根據(jù)最后一段中的TV is so often a parent’s good friend, keeping children happily occupied(占時間)so that the adults can cook dinner, answer the phone, or take a shower.。可推知選B
【4】C。標題歸納題。通讀全文可知看電視對孩子的大腦發(fā)育有害。故選C
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:
【題目】With weather __________ fine, we see more and more birds around us.
A. turns B. turning C. is turning D. to be turning
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:
【題目】Who doesn’t have a clingy friend? You know, that person who often calls, texts, and e-mails. He often needs your attention, your feedback, or your help. Worse yet, he often gets antsy when you don’t reply immediately.
Is there ever a moment when you just want to turn off your phone and be alone? But you won’t do that to a friend. Actually there are better ways to deal with a clingy friend.
Give Yourself Some Time
If you really need some time for yourself, or you’re just tired of being the listener, just explain to your friend honestly that you want or need some time of your own. Even the most determined friends will understand and give you some space. Of course, those extremely clingy friends will still call, text, and e-mail. If that happens, just reply gently that you need some time for yourself.
Suggest an Activity for Your Friend
If you are tired of different get-togethers and outings, then you should advise your friend to do something alone. If you both like sports, you could tell your friend to have a try at the new gym. If your friend likes your suggestion, but insists that you go along, just explain that you’ve already visited the gym. Mention that you enjoy the gym. If you’re lucky , he’ll try it, and like it.
Introduce Your Clingy Friend to Others.
Your clingy friend may just be lonely or have trouble meeting new people. If that’s the case , introduce him to others with similar interests. He may just make some new friends.
_________________________________________
There’s no reason for you to rudely tell your clingy friend that he’s a pain in the neck. Just follow the above advice to take your time back. After a while, your clingy friend should learn to value your time and your friendship.
【1】What does the underlined word “antsy” in Paragraph 1 probably mean?
A. busy B. silent C. nervous D. bored
【2】What does the author suggest you do in the first advice?
A. Understand your friends.
B. Be honest with your friends.
C. Spend more time with your friends.
D. Keep your distance from your friends.
【3】Which of the following can best fill in the blank of the last paragraph?
A. Give Your Friend Some Time B. Take Your Time Back
C. Don’t Be Rude D. Value Your Friendship
【4】We can learn from the passage that clingy people __________.
A. are very confident B. have little free time
C. don’t respect others D. don’t want to be alone
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:
【題目】Unlike chemists and physicists, who usually do their experiments using machines, biologists and medical researchers have to use living things like rats. But there are three Nobel prize-winning scientists who actually chose to experiment on themselves – all in the name of science, reported The Telegraph.
1. Werner Forssmann (Nobel prize winner in 1956)
Forssmann was a German scientist. He studied how to put a pipe inside the heart to measure the pressure inside and decide whether a patient needs surgery.
Experiments had been done on horses before, so he wanted to try with human patients. But it was not permitted because the experiment was considered too dangerous.
Not giving up, Forssmann decided to experiment on himself. He anaesthetized (麻醉) his own arm and made a cut, putting the pipe 30 centimeters into his vein. He then climbed two floors to the X-ray room before pushing the pipe all the way into his heart.
2. Barry Marshall (Nobel prize winner in 2005)
Most doctors in the mid-20th century believed that gastritis was down to stress, spicy food or an unusually large amount of stomach acid. But in 1979 an Australian scientist named Robin Warren found that the disease might be related to a bacteria called Helicobacter pylori.
So he teamed up with his colleague, Barry Marshall, to continue the study. When their request to experiment on patients was denied, Marshall bravely drank some of the bacteria. Five days later, he lost his appetite and soon was vomiting each morning – he indeed had gastritis.
3. Ralph Steinman (Nobel prize winner in 2011)
This Canadian scientist discovered a new type of immune system cell called the dendritic cell. He believed that it had the ability to fight against cancer.
Steinman knew he couldn’t yet use his method to treat patients. So in 2007, when doctors told him that he had cancer and that it was unlikely for him to live longer than a year, he saw an opportunity.
With the help of his colleagues, he gave himself three different vaccines based on his research and a total of eight experimental therapies(療法). Even though Steinman eventually died from his cancer, he lived four and a half years, much longer than doctors had said he would.
【1】The main purpose of the passage is to ________.
A. present some dangerous experiments that Nobel prize winners did on themselves.
B. list difficulties that scientists went through in order to make important discoveries.
C. explain why some scientists chose to experiment on themselves.
D. introduce a few Nobel prize winners who did experiments on themselves.
【2】 Which of the following is TRUE according to the article?
A. Forssmann’s experiment ended in failure.
B. Forssmann had the pipe pushed all the way into his heart.
C. Barry Marshall succeeded by drinking some Helicobacter pylori.
D. Barry Marshall’s experiment on himself confirmed that most doctors’ belief about gastritis was correct.
【3】The underlined word “gastritis” in Paragraph 5 probably means ______.
A. a kind of bacteria B. a kind of stomach disease
C. a new type of therapy D. a large aount of stomach acid
【4】From the text, we can conclude that Ralph Steinman ______.
A. discovered a new type of cancer cell called the dendritic cell
B. tried different therapies containing the dendritic cell on himself
C. had his request to experiment on patients denied
D. believed that he was better than doctors at treating cancer
【5】Where can we read such a passage?
A. In a newspaper. B. In a poster.
C. In a textbook. D. In a science book.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:
【題目】So touching_____ that I couldn’t hold my tears back when I heard it for the first time
A. the song sounds B. had the song sounded
C. the song sounded D. did the song sound
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com