Question

北京大學(xué)2010年將試行由中學(xué)校長(zhǎng)實(shí)名推薦的招生改革。被推薦的學(xué)生高考成績(jī)可獲得30分的加分。2009年11月16日北大公布了具有推薦資格的中學(xué)名單,其中福建省有6所。北大這一舉措在全國(guó)各地引起了激烈的爭(zhēng)論。請(qǐng)根據(jù)以下要點(diǎn)給《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》寫(xiě)一篇有關(guān)這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論的報(bào)導(dǎo)，并表達(dá)你對(duì)這場(chǎng)爭(zhēng)論的看法（至少兩點(diǎn)）。

支持方意見(jiàn)	反對(duì)方意見(jiàn)
1．是改革當(dāng)前高考制度的大膽嘗試。 2．能確保高素質(zhì)和有特殊才華學(xué)生進(jìn)入一流大學(xué)。 3．促進(jìn)中學(xué)重視學(xué)生的全面發(fā)展。	1．可能導(dǎo)致做假。 2．對(duì)全國(guó)許多中學(xué)不公平。 3．給被推薦的學(xué)生加分沒(méi)意義。
你的看法：1．…… 2.  ……

注意：
1．對(duì)所給要點(diǎn)逐一陳述，適當(dāng)發(fā)揮，不要簡(jiǎn)單翻譯。
2．詞數(shù)至少120字。開(kāi)頭已經(jīng)寫(xiě)好，不計(jì)入總詞數(shù)。
3．參考詞匯：大膽的bold
Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010.The recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.

Answer 1

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Peking University will enroll students recommended by high school principals in 2010. The recommended students will have extra 30 points added to their national college entrance exam scores. Peking University’s move has set off a nationwide debate.
Some people approve of this move. They think this is a bold attempt Peking University has made at reforming the current university entrance system. This move provides quality students and students talented in certain subjects with an opportunity to enter first-class universities and ensure that they aren’t overlooked simply because of their performance in the national university entrance exam. Meanwhile, it will push high schools to pay more attention to the students’ all-round development.
However, quite a few people object to the move. Firstly, it may lead to cheating. Secondly, only 39 schools are qualified to recommend students, which is unfair to so many schools across the country. Thirdly, there is no point giving extra scores to those recommended students, for they are mostly top students and have no problem entering Peking University.
As far as I’m concerned, I’m in favor of this reform. As the process of recommendation is transparent, cheating is impossible. Besides, we should support new reforms even if they are not mature.

略