Question

【題目】Before I had my son, I spent two years working with children with disabilities. I learnt that shouting and threats of punishment would result in a disaster. Coming up against their behaviour could only make the job harder and their behaviour more extreme. I found something that worked, though.

There was a very naughty boy in the nursery and a teacher who was generally very confident with the children was asked to take charge of him. One day the boy joined a session in the room next to mine. His appearance created an atmosphere of tension. He spent the entire session running around, hitting and kicking, and destroying property.

I was in the craft room working with some other children when my coworker told me that this boy's teacher was in tears, and could not get control of the situation. As we were talking, the boy ran in. I told my coworker that I would take care of him.

I closed the door. He was full of energy, throwing things around and making a huge mess. But I could see that he was doing all these to annoy me. He needed connection, and this was the only way he knew how to ask for it. So I sat back down and kept quiet. Then he slowed down and began making a rocket. I talked to him about it. We continued like this for a few minutes before I slipped into the conversation：

“So what happened today？”

It was purely a question, no blame or anger in my tone. I believe that if I had criticized him, the gate that was slowly opening would have shut firmly closed. He told me that the teacher didn't let him do what he knew well due to safety but asked him to do what he disliked. He also admitted that he had enjoyed making her run around and saw it as a game. I explained that his teacher had not seen it as a game and was very upset. This again was stated simply as a fact. I suggested that next time he had a session, he talk about what he hoped to do at the start, which might be easier for everyone. He agreed and was quiet for a moment. Then he looked at me with tears in his eyes before quietly asking if he could go to find his teacher to apologize.

【1】The boy made trouble for his teacher because he ________．

A. was accused of destroying property

B. was told not to yell at other children

C. was made to do things against his will

D. was blamed for creating an air of tension

【2】Why didn't the author do anything about the boy's bad behaviour at first?

A. She didn't want to make it worse.

B. She didn't mind the huge mess at all.

C. She was tired of shouting and threats.

D. She hadn't thought of a coping strategy.

【3】The author managed to get the boy to talk to her by ________.

A. playing games with him

B. giving him a good suggestion

C. describing his teacher's feelings

D. avoiding making critical remarks

【4】Why did the boy have tears in his eyes in the end?

A. He was sorry about his reputation.

B. He was regretful about his behaviour.

C. He was fearful of the author's warning.

D. He was sad for the author's misunderstanding.

Answer 1

【答案】

【1】C

【2】A

【3】D

【4】B

【解析】【文章大意】這是一篇情感類的記敘文。文章講述了作者從與有殘疾的小孩相處的一段經(jīng)歷中得出教育小孩更應(yīng)該需要的是交流與講道理而不是威脅甚至是懲罰，因為那樣更是適得其反。

【1】C考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)文章第六段“…but asked him to do what he disliked”可知那個男孩之所以惹麻煩是因為老師總叫他做他不喜歡的事情也就是違背他意愿的事，故C正確。

【2】A考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)文章第六段“I believe that if I had criticized him, the gate that was slowly opening would have shut firmly closed”可知作者知道如果批評的話那個小男孩就不會再交流什么了，所以作者期望情況不要惡化好利于與男孩的交流，故A正確。

【3】D考查細(xì)節(jié)理解。根據(jù)文章第六段“…no blame or anger in my tone”可知作者的語氣上沒有任何的責(zé)備與生氣，這也是作者所采取的策略即不適用任何批評性的言辭，故D正確。

【4】B考查判斷推理。根據(jù)第六段最后一句“hen he looked at me with tears in his eyes before quietly asking if he could go to find his teacher to apologize”可知男孩想去道歉，所以推斷出男孩是感到后悔了，故B正確。