Question

I’m a commercial fisherman in Alaska. It was an eye-opener to see the destruction and waste popular in the world’s fisheries. The Alaska fishery is very well managed and we do not see the damage occurring elsewhere. Many local people complain of the many restrictive (限制) laws in the fishery, but after reading these articles, I’m in favor of even stricter regulation. The sea is the basis for life on Earth, and we must take care of it.

Tom Hagen

Craig, Alaska

 

Your report presents an overly hopeless future. Here in New England where I have fished commercially for 45 years, we are beginning a recovery from years of over fishing. Under the newly authorized Magnuson-Stevens Act, fishermen are forming partnerships with scientists for the purpose of developing fishing-gear modifications (減少) to reduce by-catch and reduce impacts (沖擊) to fish habitat. Additionally, we are collecting information on fish stock abundance, population, and ecosystems. The New England Regional Fishery Management Council is supporting the formation of harvest districts, which enables fishermen to have changing market conditions.                                                                   

Frank Mirarchi

                                                Scituate, Massachusetts

 

You described fishing around the world, but not here in the United States. There is no support for the American fisherman who is working under the harshest regulations on Earth and the strictest restrictions. We are fishing in a fashion that is completely suitable as required in the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The U.S. keeps importing more fish from countries that have no requirements on gear or on their catch. U.S. fishermen cannot compete with foreign prices, so the fishermen’s numbers have been reduced. There are no young people who will take our place.

                                                 Jeremiah O’Brien

                                                 MorroBay, California

68. How is the situation about fishery in Alaska according to Tom Hagen?

   A. There is too much waste in fishery.

   B. The fishery is balanced well there.

   C. Many local fishermen liked the fishery laws before.

   D. The government is not doing their best to limit fishing.

69. Jeremiah O’Brien does not agree with ______.

   A. the opinion of Tom Hagen’s                    

   B. the opinion of Frank Mirarchi’s

   C. Magnuson-Stevens Act

   D. all the ideas in the article mentioned

70. We can see from the above passage that ______.

   A. fishery in the United States is controlled by the U.S.A government

   B. fishery in the world is running well by the Magnuson-Stevens Act

   C. in some countries there is less limitation in fishing

   D. importing fish pays more for the fishermen in the U.S.A.

71. Which of the following might serve as the best title of the above passage?

   A. Fishery in the World                   B. Fishery in the United States

   C. Fishery, a World Problem           D. Fishery Limitation, Stricter or Not

 

Answer 1

68-71 BACD