分析 文章是在說明人的指紋是具有唯一性的,隨著人的成長,年齡變老,表皮受傷等都不會改變一個人的指紋,正是利用了這一點有破獲了很多的案子,犯罪分子是抵賴不得的,即使只有一小部分也可以通過技術(shù)手段繪出人的指紋,但是如果是刀傷,燒毀就無法顯示指紋了,但這是很危險的
解答 36.G.考查上下句的銜接.下文的意思是:科學家和專家已經(jīng)證明了指紋的獨特性,從父母到孩子他們的指紋是不可能完全相似的.所以G選項是正確的,Every human being has a unique arrangement of the skin on his fingers and this arrangement is unchangeable.意思是:每一個人手指上的皮膚都有著獨特的安排,這種安排是不可改變的,與下文的指紋的獨特性就形成一致了.
37.C.考查上下句的銜接.Some criminals make use of this fact to remove their own finger-prints but this is a dangerous and rare step to take.一些犯罪分子利用了這個事實去改變他們的指紋,但是這是很危險的,也沒有措施去采取.所以上文應(yīng)說明這個事實,故答案應(yīng)為C.It is only when the inner skin is injured that the arrangement will be destroyed.只有在深層皮膚被傷的時候,這種指紋的安排才會改變,這是犯罪分子所知道的事實.
38.D.考查上下句的銜接.Finger-prints can be made very easily with printer's ink.They can be recorded easily. Because of the simplicity and economy of this system,finger-prints have often been used as a method of solving criminal case.指紋能夠很容易的用墨水制作出來,也能夠很容易的被記錄下來,因為這種便捷而又經(jīng)濟的方法,指紋已經(jīng)被經(jīng)常用來解決犯罪問題了.所以答案為D,意思是:用獨特的方法,鑒定在很短的時間內(nèi)就能被成功的完成.與下文的破案形成銜接.
39.F.考查上下句的銜接.A suspected man may deny a charge but this may be in vain. .一個犯罪嫌疑人也許會否認對他的控訴,但這是徒勞的,下文的第四個空解釋了徒勞的原因,故答案應(yīng)為F,意思是:他的指紋能證明他是誰,盡管經(jīng)過年齡或者是事故他們的面貌改變了.故答案應(yīng)為F.
40.A.考查上下句的銜接.When a suspect leaves finger-prints behind at the scene of a crime,they are difficult to detect with the naked eye. Some of the marks found are incomplete but identification is possible if a print of a quarter of an inch square can be obtained.當一個犯罪嫌疑人在作案現(xiàn)場留下指紋時,他們是很難用肉眼看到的,第五個空之后的意思是:但是如果在一個很小的地方,就算是有四分之一的指紋能被取得的話,鑒定身份也是有可能的.所以答案應(yīng)為A.用肉眼看不到并且非常小的指紋通過特殊的手段也能把他們還原出來(發(fā)展出來)故答案應(yīng)為A.
點評 七選五閱讀是完成性閱讀,和完形填空很類似,不同的是一個選詞,一個選句子.解題時,要注意上下文語境,充分考慮信息詞(選項中和空格前后句子中相同或相近的詞),選出最符合語境的句子.
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:閱讀理解
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:閱讀理解
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:填空題
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源:四川省內(nèi)江市2017屆高三第五次模擬考試英語試卷 題型:短文填空
An experiment was done on macaques(獼猴).They1.(give)a chain and taught that they would be fed if they pulled2.chain.The catch,however,was that every time they pulled the chain,another macaque would be shocked.
Even though it meant risking starvation,87% of the macaques refused3.(pull) the chain if they knew it would hurt another macaque.In one case,a macaque went a full two weeks without eating rather than deal with the guilt of4.(hurt) another animal.
It's pretty impressive when you compare that to another study because another group of5.(science) did a similar experiment on a different animal-humans.They paid people to pull a lever(杠桿)6.they said would shock another person with7.(electric).That other person was an actor who pretended to be8.great pain every time they pulled the lever.In the experiment,a full 87% of the people pulled the lever all the way to a space9.(mark) "Danger!Severe Shock!"even while hearing their victim scream painfully.It was all to get a few dollars that they could have10.(easy) earned by getting a job at McDonald's.
查看答案和解析>>
科目:高中英語 來源: 題型:書面表達
查看答案和解析>>
湖北省互聯(lián)網(wǎng)違法和不良信息舉報平臺 | 網(wǎng)上有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 電信詐騙舉報專區(qū) | 涉歷史虛無主義有害信息舉報專區(qū) | 涉企侵權(quán)舉報專區(qū)
違法和不良信息舉報電話:027-86699610 舉報郵箱:58377363@163.com