Do you sometimes argue about what seems to you to be simple fact? Do you argue whether it’s cold outdoors or whether the car in front of you is going faster than the speed limit?

If you get into such arguments, try to think about the story about the six blind men and the elephant. The first blind man who felt the elephant’s trunk said it was like a snake. The second who felt the elephant’s side said it was like a wall, while the third said it was like a spear as he touched the animal’s tusk. The fourth, who got hold of the elephant’s tail insisted that it was like a rope. The fifth man said it looked like a tree as he put his arms around one of the elephant’s legs. The sixth, who was tall and got hold of the elephant’s ears, said it was like a huge fan.

Each man’s idea of the animal came from his own experience. So if someone disagrees with you about a“simple fact”, it’s often because his experience in the matter is different from yours.

To see how hard it is for even one person to make up his mind about a“simple fact”, try this simple experiment. Get three large bowls. Put ice water in one. Put hot water in the second. Put lukewarm water in the third. Now put your left hand in the ice water. Put your right hand in the hot water. After thirty seconds, put both hands in the lukewarm water. Your right hand will tell you the water is cold. Your left hand will tell you it’s hot!

What makes people think about simple facts differently?

A. The fact that simple facts differ from one another.

B. The fact that people have different experience in the same simple fact.

C. The fact that people often disagree with one another.

D. The fact that it’s hard to make up one’s mind about simple facts.

Which of the following temperatures can the word“l(fā)ukewarm”be applied to?

A. Around 1℃          B. Above 60℃      C. Around 25℃        D. Below 0℃

After reading the last paragraph, we may think of        .

A. Newton’s law                       B. Gallileo’s theory of falling objects

C. Einstein’s theory of relativity    D. Marx’s On Capital

The main idea of this passage is         .

A. people often judge something according to his own experience

B. people often agree about simple facts

C. it’s hard for a person to make up his mind about a simple fact

D. don’t care too much about simple facts

【小題1】B【小題1】C【小題1】C【小題1】A


解析:

練習(xí)冊系列答案
相關(guān)習(xí)題

科目:高中英語 來源:湖北省華中師大一附中2012屆高三上學(xué)期期中檢測英語試題 題型:050

閱讀下列短文,從每題所給的四個選項(xiàng)(A、B、C和D)中。

  When the US started the war in Iraq a year ago, Spain was a firm supporter.But on April 18, the Spanish government started to remove its troops, becoming the first country in the US-led coalition(聯(lián)軍)to bring its soldiers home.The person behind this surprise move is the new Spanish prime minister, Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero.

  A few monthes ago, he was hardly known outside his small hometown in morthern Sain.Even a week before last month's general election, Zaatero was still considered an outsider for the top job.But just three days before the vote, a series of bomb attacks on three train stations in Madrid killed 191 people and injured som 1, 900.It was Spain's worst ever terrorist attack and it changed everything-even making Zapatero prime minister.

  From the beginning, the 43-year-old former lawyer, knew the weakness of Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar and his hand-picked successor, Mariano Rajoy.About 90 percent of the Spanish people were against the war in Iraq and were unhappy that Aznar had taken them into it.So Zapatero promised:“If this party wins the election and the UN still can't take charge in Iraq, the new government will pull its 1.400 troops out of Iraq.”

  Despite focusing on this and other Aznar mistakes, Zapatero's chances of victory were still thin until the Madrid bombings.At first, the government blamed ETA, a separatist terror group from the Basque region of northern Spain.But later evidence suggested the attack was carried out by Al-Qaida(基地)members angry at Spain's presence in Iraq.

  The people were upset, and they showed this by voting for Zapatero.Many accused the government of hiding information about the bombings and only blaming ETA so it wouldn't lose to an anti-war vote.In a move that was as shocking to the world as his election victory, Zapatero chose to carry out his promise the day after he took office.And its effect could be long-lasting.As the situation in Iraq worsens, several countries are considering their positions.The US is worried that other coalition members might follow Spain's lead and also bring their soldiers home.

(1)

Why did the Spanish government try to hide the truth from the public at first?

[  ]

A.

They feared the terrorists would escape.

B.

They were not quite sure who on earth made the attacks.

C.

They were worried that they would lose the coming election.

D.

They attempted to get rid of all ETA members.

(2)

What do you think mainly led to Zapatero's winning in the election?

[  ]

A.

Zapatero used to be a good lawyer.

B.

The chance of Zapatero's victory was always very high.

C.

The public got to know the truth about the bombings and became worried.

D.

Zapatero received some support from the US.

(3)

What do you think would probably happen after Spain's move out of Iraq.

[  ]

A.

There would be more terrorist attacks in Spain.

B.

Some more countries would bring their troops home.

C.

The US would also follow Spain's lead and pull their armies out of Iraq.

D.

The situation in Iraq would become better after Spain's move.

(4)

The main idea of the passage is that ________?

[  ]

A.

Zapatero won the election and became Prime Minister of Spain.

B.

a series of bomb attacks happened in Madrid.

C.

Spain got its troops out of Iraq.

D.

the US feels worried about Spain's move out of Iraq.

查看答案和解析>>

同步練習(xí)冊答案